<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Tips for Taking Tack-Sharp Digital Photos</title> <atom:link href="http://technicallyeasy.net/2009/10/taking-tack-sharp-digital-photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://technicallyeasy.net/2009/10/taking-tack-sharp-digital-photos/</link> <description>Making technology easier to understand.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:19:27 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Lauren Stewart</title><link>http://technicallyeasy.net/2009/10/taking-tack-sharp-digital-photos/#comment-24211</link> <dc:creator>Lauren Stewart</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 10:16:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://technicallyeasy.net/?p=1307#comment-24211</guid> <description>i own several Canon L Lenses  and they have the best quality. even better than Nikon.``.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i own several Canon L Lenses  and they have the best quality. even better than Nikon.&#8220;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Paul</title><link>http://technicallyeasy.net/2009/10/taking-tack-sharp-digital-photos/#comment-7061</link> <dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:23:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://technicallyeasy.net/?p=1307#comment-7061</guid> <description>If you are close to your subject then you may need a large aperture to blur the background. I have a Canon 50mm 1.8 II lens, which produces some nice blurring, especially for the cheap price.  Although it isn&#039;t up to the professional level.Using a zoom lens with the largest aperture, as you mentioned is another way to blur the background.  The only issue with this is that you will need to hold your camera more steady or you may blur more than just the background. Increasing the shutter speed will help with this or use a tripod.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are close to your subject then you may need a large aperture to blur the background. I have a Canon 50mm 1.8 II lens, which produces some nice blurring, especially for the cheap price.  Although it isn&#8217;t up to the professional level.</p><p>Using a zoom lens with the largest aperture, as you mentioned is another way to blur the background.  The only issue with this is that you will need to hold your camera more steady or you may blur more than just the background. Increasing the shutter speed will help with this or use a tripod.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Martini</title><link>http://technicallyeasy.net/2009/10/taking-tack-sharp-digital-photos/#comment-7059</link> <dc:creator>Martini</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:31:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://technicallyeasy.net/?p=1307#comment-7059</guid> <description>I find that at almost any setting, non-professional digital cameras keep nearly everything in focus. I don&#039;t like this. I like blurry backgrounds and the subject in focus. I take nearly all my photos at the largest aperature to do this. The depth of field created at that setting a more attractive picture (except with landscapes as you mentioned you like to do). Sometimes it&#039;s not even enough, and I step back and use my zoom to create that depth of field.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find that at almost any setting, non-professional digital cameras keep nearly everything in focus. I don&#8217;t like this. I like blurry backgrounds and the subject in focus. I take nearly all my photos at the largest aperature to do this. The depth of field created at that setting a more attractive picture (except with landscapes as you mentioned you like to do). Sometimes it&#8217;s not even enough, and I step back and use my zoom to create that depth of field.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/17 queries in 0.029 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 608/621 objects using disk: basic

Served from: technicallyeasy.net @ 2012-02-11 10:08:53 -->
